审稿意见回来，要不要改投还是要，给位虫友给个意见啊，现在好乱

　　审稿意见回来，要不要改投还是要，给位虫友给个意见啊，现在好乱。Reviewer #1
IMPORTANCE:
3. Suitable for a specialized journal
DATA OBTAINED VERIFY HYPOTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS:
Yes
APPROPRIATE LENGTH:
Yes
OTHER JOURNAL:

RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE:
3. Reject, but may become acceptable after major revisions

Reviewer #2
IMPORTANCE:
3. Suitable for a specialized journal
DATA OBTAINED VERIFY HYPOTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS:
Yes
APPROPRIATE LENGTH:

OTHER JOURNAL:
More suitable for Lab on a Chip journal
RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE:
3. Reject, but may become acceptable after major revisions

以下是编辑回信
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS.
The reviewer comments are attached below.

Unfortunately, on the basis of the reviewer comments, we are not able to
accept it for publication in Advanced Functional Materials. Since we receive
considerably more contributions than we can possibly publish in the limited
available space, we can almost only accept those manuscripts that receive
clear-cut positive reviewer reports. In addition, a further selection
process has to be applied, in which an article is also assessed as to
whether it is of great significance for the development of a topical area of
materials science. This means that papers judged to be more suitable for a
more specialized journal are not accepted for publication.

My suggestion is that we consider the paper instead for our sister journal,
the Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics.

JPS: Polymer Physics has recently undergone a relaunch and now has a broad
scope that encompasses all physical aspects of polymer systems from polymer
electronics, through optical properties to biopolymers.

At JPS: Polymer Physics we would be happy to expedite the review process for
your manuscript -- additional external review would probably not be
necessary if the referees’ concerns are addressed.

Your paper would be published online rapidly after acceptance, and we could
also offer additional exposure in the community via our news site

If you choose to follow this suggestion, please upload your manuscript as a
new submission to JPS: Polymer Physics using

this correspondence.

Thank you for considering ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS for publication. We
regret disappointing you on this occasion and I hope you will consider us
for your future manuscripts.
各位虫友麻烦给点啊，现在好乱
===有问必答===

Reject, but may become acceptable after major revisions 也不可以吗？
----

如果两个审稿人都是这个结论，编辑给拒稿是很正常的，除非该期刊缺少稿源。
----

谢谢，按照第二个审稿人改投lab on chip 几率大吗？
----
Wiley的吧？前面的3. Suitable for a specialized journal就是审稿人对你的文章的定位，基本算很低的了。后面的可以改后重投差不多算是安慰吧，不要太认真。编辑直接拒稿，没有任何你重投的话，不要浪费时间“申述”了，不会有正面结果的，改投吧
----

谢谢，按照第二个审稿人改投lab on chip 几率大吗？
----

可以试着投，几率大不大得自己判断。毕竟审稿人这么只是基于他自己的判断，不是说他Lab on a Chip准收。好好改，然后投投看吧。不过鉴于Lab on a Chip本身也是本好，所以要冒一定的风险。如果按编辑说的投JPS: Polymer Physics，估计接收应该问题不大，但是我猜你心里会有些不甘吧，呵呵。
BTW：这本八成是应化或者AM吧，呵呵，可以理解你想申述的心情，不过意义不大。
----

咔，不好意思，我看贴不仔细，原文都说了是AFM，我还在猜是Angew还是AM，呵呵