小硕一枚，首次投英文期刊，审稿意见不知怎么处理，望给点，谢谢！

　　小硕一枚，首次投英文期刊，审稿意见不知怎么处理，望给点，谢谢！。15) The authors should consider keeping the scale for the y-axis consistent in Figures 12 and 13 in order to allow for a clearer comparison of the results presented in these figures.


16) When comparing the results in Figures 16 to 18, please explain why the stains in some double hole tunnels are greater than those observed int he single hole tunnel for the same excitation, while the opposite trend is observed in other figures.
这前面都是专家给的审稿意见，下面又给了Additional Questions，这怎么处理，我应该怎样回复审稿意见？而且下面给的有的是和专家审稿意见一样的，但也有不一样的。Contribution:，Non-Commercial:，Please elaborate if necessary: ，A- Accept as is这都什么意思，要做什么？。本人小硕一枚，首次投英文，希望大神们给点，谢谢！


Additional Questions:
1. Contribution: Does the paper contribute to the permanent literature or to the immediate interests of the technical community? : M - Mandatory Revisions

Please elaborate if necessary: The paper has the potential to make contributions to the permanent literature of the technical community. However, in its current form the paper is too generic and does not add to the technical literature. The authors are advised to explore their results in detail and explain the mechanisms behind the results obtained as opposed to stating that the variations are a product of the variations in the models examined as the models were developed to study the differences.

2. Non-Commercial: Are all descriptions of commercial products, or their use, objective and not presented in an advertising manner? : A- Accept as is

Please elaborate if necessary:

3. Communication: Is the paper acceptable in literary form and structure, continuity of thought, and logical development? : M - Mandatory Revisions

Please elaborate if necessary: The English language within the paper requires substantial editing. There are a number of run-on sentences which attempt to present several ideas in the structure of a single sentence the paper difficult to follow at times. The authors are advised to have the paper reviewed and edited by an individual with excellent technical writing skills.

4. Not Previously Published: It is important that the substance of the paper shall not have been published elsewhere unless the paper is clearly defined as a review paper. Does the paper meet this requirement?
: A- Accept as is

Please elaborate if necessary