cry：人生第一次，求问各位大大，我这个应不应该重新？：cry

　　cry：人生第一次，求问各位大大，我这个应不应该重新？：cry。Dear Mr,

I am writing to you in regards to manuscript # TIP-19882-2018 entitled "Balcony-Module Networks", which you submitted to the Transactions on Image Processing. The submitted manuscript was reviewed by our editorial board to determine whether it meets the standards of this journal in terms of scope, presentation and technical depth. Please note that only the submissions which pass the preliminary review are scheduled for a full peer review. Regretfully, the review concluded that the paper is not suitable for publication in Transactions on Image Processing due to poor quality of writing and presentation,. Note that while this is the primary reason for the recommendation, the pre-screening may have found other deficiencies.Some specific comments from the editorial board members are below:

----------------------------
The manuscript presents approach 。。。. While the presented work may have technical merits, the manuscript in its current form is inadequate for further consideration. Throughout the manuscript there are numerous grammatical errors and many sentences are convoluted and hard to follow. These will greatly hamper the understanding of the presented work by the reviewers. The authors are recommended to resubmit their manuscript after significantly polishing up the manuscript. Below are just a few examples at issue:

1) Abstract: 。。。

2) First paragraph in Introduction: 。。。

3) Second paragraph in Introduction: 。。。
----------------------------

The manuscript is hereby rejected without further review

Please note that according to IEEE Signal Processing Society policy 6.16 "Handling of Rejected Papers" (

Thank you for considering the Transactions on Image Processing for the publication of your research.

Sincerely,

Gaurav
Gaurav Sharma
Editor-in-Chief, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
===有问必答===
可以修改后重新投，不过看起来文章写作有点差了，需要大修
----

修改好了，重投转投都可以


----
他貌似嫌你写的不好，格式好像不是特别符合，跟你简单说了点格式，改好之后应该可以重新


----
顶 8楼2018-12-10 18:27:37