伤心久久~大清早的

　　伤心久久~大清早的。今天第一次这么早坐在办公室看书，可是收到邮件，关于matterials letters 的，我看了看说是技术审查没过吧。邮件内容如下：
Thank you for submitting your work to Materials Letters.

Before we pass on manuscripts to the Journal Editor, who is responsible for the scientific assessment, we perform an initial check against formal technical criteria (structure of submission, adherence to the Guide for Authors and English language usage).

We regret to inform you that your manuscript has failed in the initial formal technical criteria assessment.

(1) USE OF ENGLISH

In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journals required standard. Authors have the responsibility to present papers in good English which can be understood by the journals readership. If reviewers cannot understand your work as easily as possible, the acceptance possibility of your article will be lowered greatly.

We will NOT consider a revised version of your manuscript, unless it has received a complete re-writing to improve the level of English.


(2) STRUCTURE AND COMPLETENESS

Your manuscript is NOT in accordance with every aspect listed within the author guidelines. Your manuscript should include, but not be limited to, the comments mentioned below.

1) In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journals desired standard. There are a number of grammatical errors and instances of badly worded/constructed sentences. Please check the manuscript and refine the language carefully.



(3) FINAL WORD

If you thoroughly revise your manuscript in accordance with what is stated above in (1) and (2) we welcome you to resubmit it, however, we will again check your manuscript for adherence to technical criteria. Passing this is not a guarantee that your submission will subsequently proceed to the peer review process, which is a decision to be made at the sole discretion of the Editor.

PLEASE NOTE: Materials Letters would like to enrich online articles by displaying interactive figures that help the reader to visualize and explore your research results. For this purpose, we would like to invite you to upload figures in the MATLAB .FIG file format as supplementary material to our online submission system. Elsevier will generate interactive figures from these files and include them with the online article on SciVerseScienceDirect. If you wish, you can submit .FIG files along with your revised submission.

Yours sincerely,
当时想哭的心都有了，说实话一直以来对自己的英语都很有信心的，自己的英语也是同龄人中不错的。可是邮件居然这么写，心里真的很难过，自己的英语真的那么差？？现在改怎么办？改投？修改重投?但是怎么改啊~欢迎有过同类经验的虫友支个招~~
===有问必答===
我前段时间投该期刊也是一样的回复，从心里上来说的却不太能接受，不过认真去看看，或许真的能找到不少语法或者逻辑上的不通。我改了以后，顺利通过技术审查，现在审稿中。LZ还是认改下，花几天时间好好润色，特别是图表标题。祝福楼主一切顺利~
----
淡定。退稿是很平常的了。每个人都经历过。好好修改，再投。祝好！
----
一定不要难过！第一篇SCI被技术审查打回的，可以说很普遍，不要因此信心。我就曾经遇到同样的情况。既然对自己的英语水平有信心，就认改吧，但需要注意科研论文英语写作的特点，和以前学的通用英语相比，科研论文中的表述，更直接明快，不需要太拘泥繁冗的语法，你可下几篇英美土人的论文，仔细揣摩，再看看自己的论文，应该知道怎么改了。至于改投，完全没必要，仔细修改重投吧，祝你顺利！


----
退稿并不是就一定意味着论文不行，也许是社认为你的文章内容不适合在该刊发表，所以原因很多的。
好好修改，再投他刊。
----
这很正常，几乎每篇文章都回打回来，然后过两天提交就行了，这也是体现他们的工作不是。


----
其实，写文章和自己对英语的信心不是一回事，英语你平时很好，但不一定会写文章。加油吧，朋友，，
----
英语论文属于科技论文，写作是有技巧的，平时英语好，也许只是听力，阅读和口语好，不是一回事，楼主鼓起勇气，从新修改，也不要太在意编辑说的，争取下次一次投中~~