看看编辑给我回的信，我这文章还有戏唱吗？

　　看看编辑给我回的信，我这文章还有戏唱吗？。未审就拒了，悲催。我个人对我的文章还是比较满意的。
编辑的话算是客套话吗？
I am returning your manuscript for revision before sending it out for peer review. It is my judgment that this manuscript does not have a strong appeal to the broad readership of the **** and that it is therefore unlikely to be accepted for publication here in its present form.
I do not doubt that your paper has the potential to be a strong contribution, and I do encourage you to resubmit it, but I have taken the decision to reject the paper specifically because from the beginning it needs to clearly address the broader significance of the study.It is quite possible that a kernel of what needs to be done is in the Introduction already，but as currently presented, it would seem the manuscript is only about one time slice of the basin.Therefore I hope you will rewrite the Introduction, and if necessary other parts of the paper, so that the broad readership of *** will be interested in your work.
Please note that if you wish to resubmit an improved version to the Bulletin, it shall be re-reviewed as a new manuscript. A revised manuscript would need to be substantially modified to address the concerns about why this paper should be published in the Bulletin, including clearer treatment of scientific context and broad significance.
===有问必答===
按要求修改，然后再试试，应该是有好结果的！


----
不是说了么 按他的要求改后可以发出去的 加油祝福楼主
----
编辑主要是对你的Introduction非常不满意，他觉得没有写好；其实我感觉这引言问题是中文期刊的通病，都不看重，从我的经验来看，引言是写论文的难点，从中也可以看出论文的质量和层次。加油了，
编辑还要求你其他部分最好也重新修改，然后重新提交。总的来说，对论文的核心问题编辑应该是认可的。所以按要求提交希望是有的。